WOODCUTTERS by Thomas Bernhard
â€śYou used to be in love with these ridiculous people, I told myself as I sat in the wing chair, head in heels in love with these ridiculous, low, vicious people, who suddenly saw you again after twenty years, in the Graben of all places, and on the very day Joana killed herself. They came up and spoke to you and invited you to attend their artistic dinner party with the famous Burgtheater actor in the Gentzgasse. What ridiculous, vicious people they are! I thought sitting in the wing chair. And suddenly it struck me what a low ridiculous character I myself was, having accepted their invitation and nonchalantly taken my place in their wing chair as though nothing had happened – stretching out and crossing my legs and finishing off what must by now have been my third or fourth glass of champagne.â€ť
Review by Bonnie Brody (OCT 12, 2010)
Thomas Bernhard is a writer of semi-autobiographical fiction and satire who possesses an acerbic wit. Born out of wedlock in Holland in 1931, he was raised for several years in Vienna by his maternal grandfather, himself a writer. His grandfather introduced him to the many literati of his generation and also to Schopenhauer, who remained a strong influence on Bernhardâ€™s life and writing. Bernhard considered Vienna his home though he maintained a love/hate relationship with it. The Boston Review cites that â€śIn his final will and testament, Thomas Bernhard â€“ Austriaâ€™s most infamous novelist and playwright for the past half-century, and the most outspoken critic the state has endured since Karl Kraus â€“ performed an unlikely post-mortem disappearing act. With characteristic bravado, he banned any further production and publication of his works within his home country for the duration of their copyright.â€ť Bernhard suffered from chronic tuberculosis to which he succumbed in 1989 at the age of 58. He speaks at great length about his illness in his novel, Wittgensteinâ€™s Nephew.
Woodcutters, originally written as part of a trilogy, is Bernhardâ€™s diatribe about his disgust, revulsion, loathing, hatred and vilification of the hypocrites and losers that make up the art circle in Vienna from the 1950â€™s through the 1980â€™s. In his unique style, with not one paragraph in nearly 200 pages, this novel is told primarily in stream of consciousness from the viewpoint of a writer, one not unlike Bernhard himself. The novel is in three identifiable parts â€“ the writer sitting in a wing chair observing a dinner party, the writer discussing his relationship with a recently deceased friend, and the conversations of an actor during dinner.
The first segment of the book has almost every sentence beginning with, containing, or ending with the phrase ” â€¦from my wing chair.â€ť As the writer looks on at those attending the party, from his wingchair, he remembers all the reasons that he has been estranged from these very same people for the last twenty or thirty years. He remembers all the slights he received, the lies that were told about him and the hypocrisies heâ€™s witnessed. He tries to figure out why he accepted this invitation and ruminates about it over and over, finally coming to a semi-belief that it was because his friend had committed suicide yesterday and he was feeling more vulnerable when he was invited. He recollects his history with all of the attendees, each relationship ending poorly, with the writer getting the bad end of the stick. He can think of nothing positive to say about anyone nor can he imagine why he even remains at such a despicable gathering.
The middle part of the book takes place at Joanaâ€™s funeral. Joana was the writerâ€™s friend who committed suicide the previous day. Â It is the afternoon of her funeral. As the writer recalls Joanaâ€™s time as the reigning queen of Viennaâ€™s art scene, he describes her lovely costumes, her graciousness, and her mentoring of others. She marries a weaver, a man who creates great tapestries that are sold throughout the world. It was Joana who made him famous and created the mystique that surrounded him. When he was in his prime, her husband left her for a Mexican woman and Joana, in her grief, succumbed to uncontrolled alcoholism despite several treatments. It was not without surprise that the writer learned that Joana had taken her life.
The third part of the book is the arrival, two hours late, of the actor in whose honor this dinner party is being held. (The story goes back and forth in time as gaps are filled in about different characters and the writerâ€™s relationships with them). We are privy to the conversations at the table and the rudeness, drunkenness, and shameful behaviors of the guests. The actor has just finished up an Ibsen play and is tired, as are the guests, as the dinner did not start until close to midnight. The writer is a listener and observer, discussing in his own mind the implications and audacities of all that he hears. He is especially disgusted at the rudeness of an egomaniacal woman writer who keeps alluding to the actorâ€™s old age. The actor finally snaps and gives this woman a piece of his mind, an action that the writer finds stunning. While he originally had thought poorly of the actor, the actor starts speaking about how heâ€™d like to live in the woods and be a woodcutter. For some reason, the writer finds this a lovely idea and he ends up liking the actor.
As the dinner party ends, the writer wants to be sure to leave alone. As a misanthrope, having company is one of the worst things he can imagine. He says polite and hypocritical goodbyes to his hosts creating his own self-loathing as he sees he is no better than those he criticizes for their false charms and graciousness. What heâ€™d like to say to his hosts is that he hates them, that he has no idea why he came to this awful party, and that he hopes he doesnâ€™t see them for another twenty or thirty years. However, he does not do this. He plays his role as polite guest and leaves in an almost manic mood. He walks and runs around the streets of Vienna alternately embracing and hating this city that is his, despite all its foibles.
For those of us who can embrace Bernhardâ€™s unique style, he is a breath of fresh air. His writing has a post-modern feel to it as he examines everything as part of something else, yet everything having a separate and distinct context in its own right. Everything is connected and nothing touches anything else. We can wonder till the planetsâ€™ ends and still come up with more and more reasons for why any particular event, action, or thought exists. The last thing Bernhard would call himself is a philosopher, but despite his self-description, there is a lot of philosophizing going on in his book. (Translated from German by David McLintock.)
|AMAZON READER RATING:||from 8 readers|
|PUBLISHER:||Vintage (August 10, 2010)|
|AVAILABLE AS A KINDLE BOOK?||Not Yet|
|AUTHOR WEBSITE:||Thomas Bernhard
Wikipedia page onÂ Thomas Bernhard
|MORE ON MOSTLYFICTION:||Read our review of:|
- On the Mountain (1959; 1991 in English)
- Frost (1963; 2006 in English; 2008 in US)
- Three Novellas: Amras, Playing Watten, Walking (1964; 2003 in English)
- Gargoyles (1967; 1970 in English; 2006 in US)
- The Lime Works (1970; 1973 in English; March 2010 in US)
- Correction (1975; 1979 in English)
- The Voice Imitator: Stories (1978; 1997 in English)
- Concrete (1982; 1984 in English; August 2010 in US)
- Cutting Timber: An Irritation 1984; 1985 in English) also translated as Woodcutters in 1988; August 2010 in US)
- Wittengenstein’s Nephew (1982; 1988 in English ; October 2009 in US)
- Old Masters: A Comedy (1985; 1989 in English)
- The Cheap Eaters (1980; 1990 in English)
- The Loser (1983; 1991 in English; 2006 in US)
- Yes (1978; 1991 in English)
- Extinction (1986; 1995 in English)
- Gathering Evidence: A Memoir (1975; 1982 in English; 2003)
- Thomas Bernhard: The Making of an Australian by Gitta Honegger (2001)